India's New Criminal Laws: What BNS, BNSS and BSA Change
More than two years after three new statutes replaced the IPC, the CrPC and the Evidence Act, a practical guide to what has changed for complainants, accused persons and witnesses.
Bail & Trial

Overview
Since 1 July 2024, criminal law in India has been governed by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), which replaced the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Indian Evidence Act. Matters that began earlier may still be governed in part by the old law. We advise on both, and on how the transition bears on a particular case.
The work rests on a close reading of the FIR, the charge-sheet and the documents the prosecution relies on; plain advice about the risks; and measured advocacy before the magistrate, the sessions court and the High Court.
Scope
Applications for regular bail before the magistrate, the sessions court and the High Court, and for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS where arrest is apprehended, including the setting and modification of bail conditions.
Advice on notices of appearance under Section 35 of the BNSS, attendance before investigating officers, the rights of an arrested person, remand hearings, and default bail where the charge-sheet is not filed within the statutory period.
Defence before magistrates and sessions courts: discharge applications, arguments on the framing of charges, cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, defence evidence and final arguments.
Petitions to the High Court under Section 528 of the BNSS to quash FIRs, complaints or proceedings that disclose no offence, amount to an abuse of process, or have been genuinely settled between the parties where the law allows.
Appeals against conviction and sentence, applications to suspend a sentence pending appeal, and revision petitions against orders open to revision, before the sessions court, the High Court and the Supreme Court.
Complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, from the statutory demand notice through trial, interim compensation, appeal and compounding, and the defence of such complaints.
Cases of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, corruption and other financial offences, which often run alongside civil, tax or regulatory proceedings and need to be handled consistently across all of them.
Scrutiny of electronic records, including the certificate now required under Section 63 of the BSA, together with forensic reports and call detail records, which increasingly decide criminal trials.
Approach
We establish the stage the matter has reached, what the FIR or complaint actually alleges, and whether arrest is a real risk, so that protection can be sought before it is needed.
Where appropriate we apply for anticipatory or regular bail, prepare the client for any appearance before the police, and insist that the safeguards governing arrest and remand are observed.
We study the charge-sheet and every document relied on, identify gaps and inconsistencies, consider discharge or quashing, and prepare cross-examination around the evidence rather than assumptions.
We conduct the trial with care and, where the result calls for it, pursue appeal, revision or suspension of sentence without delay.
Questions
Regular bail is sought by a person who has been arrested or is in custody. Anticipatory bail, now provided for in Section 482 of the BNSS, is sought in advance from the sessions court or the High Court by a person who has reason to believe they may be arrested for a non-bailable offence; if it is granted, they are to be released on bail in the event of arrest. Courts generally weigh the nature and gravity of the accusation, the applicant's antecedents, the risk of flight, and whether the accusation appears intended to injure or humiliate. Conditions are commonly imposed, such as joining the investigation when required and not leaving India without permission.
As a general rule, an offence committed before 1 July 2024 is defined and punished under the Indian Penal Code, because a person cannot be convicted under a criminal law that was not in force when the act was done. On procedure, the BNSS provides that appeals, applications, trials, inquiries and investigations pending immediately before that date continue under the Code of Criminal Procedure, while proceedings begun afterwards generally follow the BNSS. The transition has raised questions that the courts are still resolving, so the position in a particular case should be checked against its own dates and stage.
The High Court has inherent power, now found in Section 528 of the BNSS, to quash an FIR or criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. The Supreme Court has described the kinds of cases where this is appropriate, for instance where the allegations, even if accepted as they stand, do not make out an offence, or where the proceedings are manifestly malicious. Disputes of a predominantly private or commercial character that the parties have genuinely settled may also be quashed even when the offence is not compoundable. The power is used sparingly, and not for serious offences that affect society at large.
Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the cheque must have been presented within its period of validity, currently three months from its date. A written demand notice must be sent to the drawer within thirty days of receiving the bank's information that the cheque was returned unpaid. If the drawer does not pay within fifteen days of receiving the notice, a complaint may be filed before the magistrate within one month after those fifteen days end. The notice deadline is applied strictly, and a court may condone delay in filing the complaint only for sufficient cause, so keep the return memo, the notice and proof of its dispatch and delivery. The offence is compoundable, and during the trial the court may order the drawer to pay interim compensation of up to twenty per cent of the cheque amount.
A notice under Section 35 of the BNSS is issued where arrest is not considered necessary at that stage. If you comply with the notice and continue to comply, the law provides that you are not to be arrested for that offence unless the police officer, for reasons recorded in writing, forms the opinion that arrest has become necessary. Attend as directed, keep a copy of the notice, and take advice beforehand, particularly if the allegations are serious or the notice is unclear. Where there is a genuine apprehension of arrest, anticipatory bail can be considered.
Electronic records can be proved as evidence under the BSA. Where a copy is relied on rather than the original device, Section 63 of the BSA requires a certificate in the prescribed form, signed both by the person in charge of the device or system and by an expert. Questions of authenticity, completeness and the manner in which a record was obtained are frequently contested, so the original device and data should be preserved from the outset.
Insights
More than two years after three new statutes replaced the IPC, the CrPC and the Evidence Act, a practical guide to what has changed for complainants, accused persons and witnesses.
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act runs on strict deadlines. A step-by-step guide to presentation, the demand notice, the fifteen-day window, filing the complaint, interim compensation and settlement.
A consultation of about an hour with an advocate of the firm, to understand your position and the options open to you. Fees are discussed and agreed beforehand.
Bar Council of India · Rule 36
The Bar Council of India does not permit advocates to solicit work or advertise in any form or manner. This website is maintained for information only.
By clicking "I agree", you acknowledge that you are seeking information about VERMANCO of your own accord, and that there has been no solicitation, advertisement, invitation or inducement of any kind by the firm or any of its members.
The content of this website is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Use of this website, or communication with the firm through it, does not create an advocate–client relationship. VERMANCO is not liable for any consequence of action taken on the basis of material on this website.
Read the full Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.